It is very difficult to keep from ethical assessment of the book, especially, so far as concerns children, about inoculation of moral values by him, but we will try to remain within book assessment only in terms of children's psychology. So, authors say that the project purpose:to bring up the tolerant attitude towards others in children. What it for others? In the interview Lyudmila Ulitskaya reported that in the book there is a small insert that in the world except the families famous to us from cultural sources, there are families homosexual. Well, about small insert the writer obviously dissembles. Why won't she mention about rather big inserts telling to children about pedophilia and an incest? We will give some fragments of the
The book is intended for children of younger and middle school age. Information and a form in which it is given, capable to do harm to children's mentality. Children to teenage age differ in what everything that is told them by adults, they perceive as the law of life. They know nothing about the world around, about his laws, they learn all this from adults. For this reason in all works, in children's fairy tales if the evil, then always with condemnation is shown, with demonstration of how the evil is punished, and the good wins. Thus to the child the instrument of distinction of the good and evil takes root. For now children don't have this tool, they will perceive information noncritically. Features of their
And what in the book by Vera Timenchik? There it is told the child about an incest and pedophilia, as about something, self-evident. A position of authors to pedophilia quite benevolent. In this case in children's awareness the image of such relationship as normal is formed. It is
The form in which this information is submitted, on the one hand, allows to influence mentality of the child more effectively in total the main characters of the book – children to whom very advanced mother tells about different types of relationship, giving at the same time striking examples from life of others. And with another, such form allows to wave away from any charges:nothing we are engaged in pedophilia promotion here, we about the African Azande nationality tell.
Further, madam Ulitskaya says that it is necessary to tell the child about homosexuality as it will protect the children living in homosexual families from persecution at
But the matter is that pursue children at schools, as a rule, not because of some unusual external circumstances at all. Yes, can tease also for the external reasons, but tease all children, sometimes children lift up each other for the ridiculous reasons from the point of view of the adult. All these teasers quickly pass and are forgotten. And here full long-term persecution is absolutely other phenomenon. And quite often poison children from externally quite successful, ordinary families. As a rule, the persecution reason in children's collectives – personal features of the child who is poisoned. His character, but not external data or features of his environment. Children live in the, Toy world, they are interested in peers, but not foreign parents. It is absolutely senseless and dangerous to drag children in the world of a sexual relationship of adults.
By the way, if to follow the logic sounded by the writer who is standing up for stories to children about homosexuality with the purpose to impart the tolerant attitude towards homosexuals then stories about pedophilia in the same book have to impart the tolerant attitude towards pedophiles?
Conclusion:similar books won't make life of the children living in homosexual "families" - brothels it is easier. But they will absolutely precisely make heavier life of the children living in normal traditional families. The books imparting a rebeka tolerance to the evil cut the grass from under feet of it, do it weak, strike blow to his ability to fight back, be protected from this evil <.br/>
